I love it when

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

I love it when

Postby MHD on Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:16 pm

People relax and the camera loves it!
This one taken with a borrowed 50mm f/1.8

Image

I cropped as in the original I aimed a bit high...

So comments?
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Greg B on Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:33 pm

1. I like it.
2. The subjects - or as others might say, the people - look relaxed
3. The 50mm 1.8 is a lens to covet, methinks, or as Birdy would say "I lust the lens"
4. When you have 3000 x 2000 pixels, a bit of cropping is no problem
5. Matt will be positively orgasmic that the main subject is smack dab in the middle.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Matt. K on Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:36 pm

This image demonstrates the power of direct eye contact. It would not have worked otherwise.

God bless direct eye contact. Well done!
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Kris on Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:21 pm

I like it :D

That lens I think is the same lens Glen demonstrated to me a few nights ago... Theres one I ebay I have my eye on :P
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby MHD on Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:55 pm

Danke..

I'm thinking about going straight to the 1.4... one less lens to buy that way...

But I will own one of the two... amazing lens... just makes things punch!

And the eye contact is great!
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby JordanP on Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:12 pm

Thats a great image. I like that lens so much that I think I snaveled the one you were looking at on Ebay Kris.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby Raydar on Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:37 pm

JordanP wrote: I like that lens so much that I think I snaveled the one you were looking at on Ebay Kris.


That nice isn't it????? LOL :D

One great lens, I love mine :)

Cheers
Ray :lol:
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby Greg B on Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:45 pm

MHD wrote:Danke..

I'm thinking about going straight to the 1.4... one less lens to buy that way...

But I will own one of the two... amazing lens... just makes things punch!

And the eye contact is great!


What is the difference between 1.8 and 1.4 - is it a whole stop?

The 1.4 is $550 or so, the 1.8 is $240. The price difference is a decent chunk of change.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby MHD on Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:50 pm

When I look at the optical profile on the maxwell site (lets see if I can hotlink)
1.4:
Image
1.8:
Image

Its just more glass!

Plus buying the 1.4 now means I will not buy the 1.8 now and the 1.4 later!
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Allan on Wed Oct 20, 2004 6:28 pm

MHD wrote: Plus buying the 1.4 now means I will not buy the 1.8 now and the 1.4 later!

Exactly....I'm going through that exercise as we speak. I bought the 70-300G zoom in June and I think it's hopeless especially from 200mm out.
So now it's on to the 70-300ED, which I've demoed and is much better.
Same sort of exercise with fiters. Santa's coming early here.
Al.
No matter how long he looks at the menu, he always orders the mustard prawns.
Allan
Newbie
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 4:26 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby bago100 on Wed Oct 20, 2004 6:40 pm

Good grief :shock:

Here I am, at work all day, slaving away and then when I get home I find you've all been happily chatting away on this forum for most of the day about lenses and shots and all manner of stuff!

Shame, shame and more shame on all of you :P

Cheers

Graham
User avatar
bago100
Senior Member
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Shanghai China until Feb 2010

Postby W00DY on Wed Oct 20, 2004 6:48 pm

bago100 wrote:Good grief :shock:

Here I am, at work all day, slaving away and then when I get home I find you've all been happily chatting away on this forum for most of the day about lenses and shots and all manner of stuff!

Shame, shame and more shame on all of you :P

Cheers

Graham


I love working in IT... Basically sit on the Internat untill something happens :)
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby Greg B on Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:24 pm

MHD wrote:When I look at the optical profile on the maxwell site (lets see if I can hotlink)
1.4:
Image
1.8:
Image

Its just more glass!

Plus buying the 1.4 now means I will not buy the 1.8 now and the 1.4 later!


Excellent depiction of the physical difference - yep, it is a lot more glass in the 1.4

But - extra glass notwithstanding - is 1.4 to 1.8 a whole stop? What do you get for the extra $300? More glass, yes. But is it the difference between 1/30 and 1/60? I am interested. :?
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Matt. K on Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:25 pm

The difference between f1.4 and f1.8 is not a full stop. Frankly, it's not worth the extra unless you do lots of very low light photography.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Killakoala on Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:28 pm

More glass and a much bigger hole through the lens... :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Onyx on Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:40 pm

You guys shoulda been contemplating this a fortnight ago - I would have been able to bring home cheap cheap glass for all... from the US. :)
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby ajo43 on Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:56 pm

Responding to Allan a couple of posts above.

I thought that the 70-300G and the 70-300ED were basically the same lens. Ken Rockwell has a (slightly eccentric) review of both of them on his site.

I don't know if he is full of it but he certainly sounds convincing and has some nice shots on his site.
Regards

Jonesy
User avatar
ajo43
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 1:55 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby MHD on Fri Oct 22, 2004 4:03 pm

I agree with this... thats why I bought the G type lens..

they have (AFIAK) exactly the same optical profile except the ED lens has one ED element and its not a critical bit of glass...

while some (Gary) will disagree I have no probs with my G lens and it is not duplicated by anything I have or want

What will replace it is a bit of fast long glass ($$$$$$$)
for when I am rich (Hell I'm still a student earn bugger all!)
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby birddog114 on Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:35 pm

Onyx wrote:You guys shoulda been contemplating this a fortnight ago - I would have been able to bring home cheap cheap glass for all... from the US. :)


Hey,
If this the case then TSA and Customs will have a good look at you, 1 x D70 with 10 x 70-300G lens, then who's going to bail you out huh?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests