Slide film and scanning

Many of our members still have film cameras. And some even use them! This is for film junkies

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Slide film and scanning

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:07 pm

I have read that Fuji have released the Provia 400X which is supposed to be as finely grained as 100 ISO film.

Now, I was wondering if it is worthwhile going through the expense of shooting slide film, such as this, to end up scanning it when I could just shoot negative film for the same purpose.

Given that slide film has a lesser exposure latitude than neg film, is more expensive to buy and develop, and would (I understand) be harder to develop myself (when I get around to it) - is there a benefit to this compared to sticking with good 'ol neg film? eg. Fuji Pro 160 vs Provia 100 (ok, 1 stop difference, etc).

Hopefully I have explained my question well enough :lol:
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby ATJ on Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:14 pm

Patrick,

You may have answered your own questions (all the disadvantages of slide film), although I guess you want the benefit of ISO 400 over ISO 100 of negative film.

I used to shoot almost exclusively with slide film, and while all the disadvantages you list were true back then, I found I got much richer and deeper colours. Processing E6 does have more steps than C41 but it really isn't any more difficult. I used to do my own E6, too.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:27 pm

Thanks for the fast reply.

Re 400vs100 ISO - I obviously realise I can get both in both mediums (hey, would evel like to try some 50 Velvia). So the ISO as such is not an issue.

Just wondering if the greater saturation that I understand you can get with slide film is worth the effort.

Sorry if my questioning is disjointed :D I just want to get an idea of the benefits (if any) of shooting slide for the purpose of scanning compared to negs (taking out the difference in film types). Or, at least, what issues I can consider in making up my mind.

(To put it in one perspective, the cost of developing 120 neg film is $5.50 at the Fuji staff shop locally. The cost for 120 slide film is something like $28)
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby ATJ on Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:32 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:Just wondering if the greater saturation that I understand you can get with slide film is worth the effort.

In my opinion, it is, but only if you get the exposure right. Half a stop either way and you can either blow highlights or lose too much detail - although you have a little bit more margin for error on the latter.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby phillipb on Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:50 pm

Patrick, in the pre-digital era, if you wanted to get something published by a magazine it had to be submitted as a transparency and the reason was mainly due to quality. I guess it really depends of what you intend to do with the slides. I used to print slides onto Cibachrome paper and the quality was generally far superior to anything else in the c-41 world.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby ATJ on Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:18 pm

I just thought of another benefit of scanning slide film over negative film...

It should be a lot easier to get the colours right first go when scanning slide film. There will be some subtle difference from one film type to another, but nowhere as big as the difference from one C41 film to another. I remember when I used to print my own slides (on Cibachrome) and negs (on Kodak paper) and the latter was far more fiddly in terms of the filters in the enlarger. I would have to image you'd have the same issues with scanning.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:22 pm

Thanks guys

I would be nervous developing my own slide film (haven't even developed neg film yet!), but would like to try shooting a bit more with slide. I just didn't want them to then sit in a draw not being viewed.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Slide film and scanning

Postby gstark on Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:27 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:I have read that Fuji have released the Provia 400X which is supposed to be as finely grained as 100 ISO film.


Actually, what I've heard is that this is actually going to be new CF/SD card technology, imparting the film characteristics into any camera by modifying the files as they're being written to the card by the firmware on the card.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:30 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:Thanks guys

I would be nervous developing my own slide film (haven't even developed neg film yet!),



Easy.

We can do a workshop one day; all we need is a location.

And the time.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby ATJ on Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:46 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:I would be nervous developing my own slide film (haven't even developed neg film yet!),

It is easier than you probably think. If you can read instructions, a watch and a thermometer, you have all the skills required, well, other than loading film into the developing tank which can be a bit tricky.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Matt. K on Mon Aug 20, 2007 11:46 pm

Patrick
I think a switch to scanned slide film would only be worthwhile if it was medium format. Otherwise the current crop of DSLs can equal the quality of 35mm and there would be little or nothing to gain. I've been scanning a fair bit of film lately and the 6 x 6 and 6 x 7 really gives a lovely result. The scanner is the Epson V700.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9980
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:04 am

Matt. K wrote:Patrick
I think a switch to scanned slide film would only be worthwhile if it was medium format. Otherwise the current crop of DSLs can equal the quality of 35mm and there would be little or nothing to gain. I've been scanning a fair bit of film lately and the 6 x 6 and 6 x 7 really gives a lovely result. The scanner is the Epson V700.


Matt - MF slide film was what I really had in mind, although, I am not sure of the quality of the scanner we are getting (for nuthin') is. But, saving up for the V700 if my scanning escapades go ok.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby DavidR on Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:21 pm

sorry to divert the topic (a lil) but im going to have a bronica sq-a in my possession soon and i was looking into getting a neg scaner, ive heard you can get cheap add on ones for regular scanners. is this true? also will a neg scanner be able to handle slide film? as i want to shoot slide stuff for publication applications instead of relying on my DSLR
nikon d300, 10.5mm f2.8, 17-50mm f2.8, 50-150mm f2.8. Bronica sq-a 80mm f2.8,. sunpak 383's and a 622 for kicks, pw's, and other assorted bag fillers
User avatar
DavidR
Member
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Unley Adelaide

Postby ATJ on Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:25 pm

DavidR wrote:sorry to divert the topic (a lil) but im going to have a bronica sq-a in my possession soon and i was looking into getting a neg scaner, ive heard you can get cheap add on ones for regular scanners. is this true? also will a neg scanner be able to handle slide film? as i want to shoot slide stuff for publication applications instead of relying on my DSLR

If you can afford it, get a Epson V700. It is the bee's knees in scanners. While it is a flat bed, it will do as good a job on negs and slides as some of the dedicated film scanners.

http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/intera ... page_8.htm
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:55 pm

Well, I may get m'self a box of Provia 400X 120 film to try. Although the cost of developing is a bit rich!

gstark wrote:Easy.

We can do a workshop one day; all we need is a location.

And the time.


That would be a good idea, location and time permitting!
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:26 am

Reschsmooth wrote:Well, I may get m'self a box of Provia 400X 120 film to try. Although the cost of developing is a bit rich!

gstark wrote:Easy.

We can do a workshop one day; all we need is a location.

And the time.


That would be a good idea, location and time permitting!


And I've just had a thought about this ... :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:47 am

Did it feel good?? :lol:
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:25 am

It certainly was a rare event. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:31 am

Cherish the feeling! :D

What, pray tell, was that thought?
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:47 am

Reschsmooth wrote:Cherish the feeling! :D

What, pray tell, was that thought?


That would be telling.

But I did remember that we may soon have access to a recently acquired resource that just might have some suitability for this sort of exercise.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby phillipb on Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:57 am

Gary, not sure what you have in mind, but if you are thinking of establishing a good old fashioned darkroom, I can donate an antique colour analyser last known to be working 25 years ago. :lol:
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:12 pm

phillipb wrote:Gary, not sure what you have in mind, but if you are thinking of establishing a good old fashioned darkroom, I can donate an antique colour analyser last known to be working 25 years ago. :lol:


Phillip,

That would be very nice.

I have enough hardware to take film through to neg (or tranny) stage (not that that's a lot of hardware), and I think I have some trays and tongs, so that just leaves us in need of an enlarger.

And yes, the venue, which was the subject of my thought, as noted above.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:15 pm

That would be great - especially if someone is also willing to run a tute or demo on scanning negs/trannies (leave the innuendo at the door :lol: )
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby phillipb on Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:19 pm

gstark wrote:
And yes, the venue, which was the subject of my thought, as noted above.


Geez, I hope you're not thinking of tossing Leigh out of his room. :shock:
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:24 pm

phillipb wrote:
gstark wrote:
And yes, the venue, which was the subject of my thought, as noted above.


Geez, I hope you're not thinking of tossing Leigh out of his room. :shock:


What room?

Who's Leigh, anyway? :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Slide film and scanning

Postby Viz on Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:17 am

I have an ANCIENT (40s or 50s or something) condenser enlarger... I have forgotten the brand. The condenser glass is good from memory, though it needs a new lens. I would love to see this old beast get some action one day...
Dan The Batch Automator
User avatar
Viz
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Leichhardt, Sydney

Re: Slide film and scanning

Postby gstark on Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:43 am

Viz wrote: I would love to see this old beast get some action one day...


I could say the same about the person of the first party. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Film and Non-Digital Imaging

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests