AGFA - R.I.P.

Many of our members still have film cameras. And some even use them! This is for film junkies

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

AGFA - R.I.P.

Postby Greg B on Mon May 30, 2005 9:35 am

The German parent company of AGFA filed for bankruptcy on Friday. The Australian operation is in strife.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/National/ ... 03872.html

I guess it is a further reflection of the incredible take up of digital. It is not dissimiliar to the move from vinyl records to CDs.

I was a huge fan of Agfapan 100, thought it was better than Plus X.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Glen on Mon May 30, 2005 9:39 am

It is sad to see these names go :(
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby genji on Mon May 30, 2005 10:05 am

Glen wrote:It is sad to see these names go :(


i'm going to play devil's advocate, why is it sad to see agfa go? i always thought they were a third rate film and print company.

my digital prints from agfa machines were always dull, but yet with fuji very close to my monitor, without calibration.

isnt lieca almost going extinct aswell?
User avatar
genji
Senior Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------

Postby Glen on Mon May 30, 2005 10:15 am

Genji,
Godd point, why is it sad to see them go? For me it is because I shot a lot of memories when travelling on Agfa film and also my mother had an Agfa camera for a long time. I thought their film was alright.

I would also be sad to see Leica go, even though never having owned one I admired there quality from afar. Today they are not as relevant as in the past, but I still admire their quality, much as I would admire a fine manual tool or slightly outdated machinery such as a Nakamichi cassete deck.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Greg B on Mon May 30, 2005 10:23 am

Genji, I agree that some agfa stuff was not top line, but as I said above, I really liked the Agfapan 100. This was my favourite BW film. Their transparency film wasn't great IMO, but their paper wasn't bad.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby redline on Mon May 30, 2005 10:52 am

thats great, start stocking up on agfa film into the freezer it goes!
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby gstark on Mon May 30, 2005 11:07 am

genji wrote:
Glen wrote:It is sad to see these names go :(


i'm going to play devil's advocate, why is it sad to see agfa go? i always thought they were a third rate film and print company.


Genj, have you ever spent time in a B&W darkroom?

Like Greg, I've always thought that AP100 was a far superior quality film to FP4 and whatever the Kojak equivalent was. Much smoother tonal gradation, and just a delight to shoot with and use.

And the B&W papers were at least the equivalent of Ilford.

In terms of colour, no not as good as Fuji, but real photographers don't shoot colour, right? :)

As to labs that produce prints using Agfa stuff, all I can say is that there are labs, and there are labs, and not all labs are created equal.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby redline on Mon May 30, 2005 11:11 am

iam happy with using delta 100-400 and ilford paper, but i still would like to try out the agfa range of films, shame it shutting up shop.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Nnnnsic on Mon May 30, 2005 3:40 pm

Shit. I will definetly have to build up some stock of Agfapan 100 in my fridge...

I preferred the Agfa paper over the Ilford, honestly. I went for it over the Ilford every chance I got because I loved the contrast it gave me as well as the slightly off-white the paper was... (and the fiber paper smelled good... I don't know what it was, but it did...)

They're not "dead" yet... they might survive this... but because the analog market is dying more heavily now and they haven't seem to have adapted in the same way that Ilford have, I don't really see Agfa escaping this.

It's a real shame because those AgfaNet competitions were quite interesting and a great way to introduce people to photography.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby kipper on Mon May 30, 2005 7:43 pm

It's interesting what you say Redline, I'm sure the B&W side of AGFA are great. However Ted's use AGFA printing systems and I was commenting the other day that my bird pictures have turned greys into blues, yellows into orange.

Image


Does anybody here think the tail on that bird looks blue? I've viewed it on a few monitors, and it all appears grey to me. However it comes out blue when printed at an AGFA lab.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby joolz on Mon May 30, 2005 9:10 pm

Looks grey to me Kipper. BTW - good shot. Looks painterly at this size.
Julian
User avatar
joolz
Member
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Preston, Melbourne

Postby kipper on Mon May 30, 2005 9:11 pm

Joolz, yeah it looks grey on my monitor aswell. However Ted's print it as a blue-grey.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby PiroStitch on Mon May 30, 2005 9:20 pm

have you tried printing it elsewhere? It might not be the paper itself but the printer/lab equipment....
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby kipper on Mon May 30, 2005 9:22 pm

Nah only at Ted's Chadstone, first time I've really payed attention to color discrepancies. Most of the shots I've had done have been 6x4s and of people. This was my first big photo that I've had done that hasn't been a person.

Piro, it's AGFA paper, AGFA lab/equip


Kind of interesting, what will Ted's do now. Replace all of their equipment to Fuji? Hope so :)

Genji I'm with you dude, everytime I've had stuff printed at a Fuji lab it has come up quite good. I used to always get prints done at Michaels, but after they spoke rudely to me when I was buying my D70 I have decided to boycott them.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby PiroStitch on Mon May 30, 2005 9:34 pm

Too bad you can't try a kodak printer or some other brand with Agfa paper ;)


I've had stuff printed by Teds as well on Agfa paper with the colour coming out incorrectly, which has prompted me to never ever use Teds. It sounds contradictory, but I try not to jump to conclusions ;) If they could try using other types of paper instead of Agfa, and the colours still turned out the same, then I'd say it was the printer not the paper...however if it was a different printer (ie. Kodak, Fuji, etc) on Agfa paper and the results were the same, then it's the paper. I know it's highly unlikely that you will get diff. printer and paper brands inter-mixing, but there's always hope ;)

I've used Agfa film before and the colours turned out great :)
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby joolz on Mon May 30, 2005 9:43 pm

I'm not a fan of Teds' AGFA colour calibration either.
Then again, the Fuji frontier system isn't perfect either, but is the better of the two.
I find the Fujis tend to blow the highlights rather abruptly rather than a gradual transition to white.
At least prices are coming down. Last I checked, 6x4s are 29c at most of the Elizabeth st. stores in Melbourne.
I think Hardly Normal are charging 33c.
If you are on Elizabeth, I can recommend the Fuji lab in the Galleria (owned by a friend).
Julian
User avatar
joolz
Member
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Preston, Melbourne

Postby Matt. K on Mon May 30, 2005 9:54 pm

Agfa made some some great papers. Contrasty grainy and tons of impact. For a period there in the 70's nearly every B&W darkroom would have a stock of this stuff. Great for action shots. Oh well...guess I'll have to settle for an AGFA Photoshop plug-in. :lol: :lol:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9980
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby genji on Mon May 30, 2005 11:16 pm

gstark wrote:...
Genj, have you ever spent time in a B&W darkroom?

...


yes, i have spent time in a dark room, back in uni. it was cheap to buy -T-max? (i cant remember) from the photography club.

all my gear was cheap and batterd PJ equipment.

was t-max good? i didnt care, it was simply photography.

IMHO, i dont lament the death of any commercial company.

and as MAtt K said...a AGFA plug-in will be available soon....
User avatar
genji
Senior Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------


Return to Film and Non-Digital Imaging

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests

cron