Focusing on a 20D

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Focusing on a 20D

Postby cordy on Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:53 pm

Hey all,

A quick question about the focusing on the 20D. Im curious how fast the focusing is? The reason Im asking in particular is I need to know if its acceptable for shooting fast moving jets and motorsports?

A little dissapointed with the D200 launch - price is pretty horrible and they havent really improved the focusing over the D70 much.

Cheers,

Chris
cordy
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D

Postby petal666 on Thu Nov 03, 2005 1:03 pm

I know people who use the 20D for motor sport. Works fine with my Sigma 120-300f2.8 and even better with a Canon 300f2.8
Canon 1D III
User avatar
petal666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III

Postby DaveB on Thu Nov 03, 2005 1:34 pm

The focus is very fast on the 20D, but there are lots of factors that come into it.

First, the faster the lens you're using (ie. the more light it lets in) then the more contrast that is available for the AF sensors to detect. This does affect the speed in most light conditions as well as the basic ability to focus in lower light.
The reduced DOF of the wider aperture can also allow the body to achieve better focus, as it focusses to "within the DOF" rather than to an absolute point.

Second, the focus mechanism in the lens makes a big difference. Canon's old AFD motors are slow and noisy. The "micromotor USM" (as used in the 75-300mm IS clunker) is quiet but just as slow. The micromotor USM lenses have a USM motor that then drives traditional lens gearing, whereas the "ring USM" has a USM motor that goes all the way around the lens and drives it directly.
"Ring USM" (Sigma's HSM is roughly equivalent although possibly a bit slower on some lenses) is very fast at focussing.

You can't tell from the name of an EF lens which type of USM it has: it will just include "USM" in the name. But ring USM can generally be distinguished by the ability to manually change the focus without having to switch the lens explicitly to MF. This FTM (full-time manual focus) when combined with custom functions on the body opens up more possibilities (e.g. I sometimes prefocus manually then use AF to finish the job, and vice versa).

So, a 20D combined with a fast lens with ring USM will focus very quickly indeed (ok, if you're used to a 1DMkII body you might not use the word "very" in that description, but it's still fast). A 10D isn't as good, and a D60 is horrible by comparison (for fast-moving subjects, at least).

But there's still more to the story. If you're tracking a moving object you need to keep the relevant AF sensor on the appropriate part of the subject as you pan. The 20D only has 9 sensors, with sizeable gaps between them. This isn't as effective as (say) a 1D-series body with 45 sensors. The 5D has introduced 6 more sensors positioned to fill some of those gaps and allow better transference of subject focus between different points.
How well this will work for you is a personal thing. I have a lot of success with flying birds, swimming/jumping dolphins, etc, and when I've been at Avalon Airshow I've been happy with the performance with flying planes.

But as with everything, YMMV!
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby cordy on Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:53 pm

Ahh yeap, thanks guys - that clears it up for me. I was at Avalon too and had some issues with a quick lense + D70 and this has been attributed to the D70's focusing.

Looks like I may be moving to the darkside sooner than I thought then :P

Thanks again

Chris
cordy
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D

Postby DaveB on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:00 pm

I just realised I wrote "USM motor". That would be an UltraSonic Motor motor...

Sigh! I hate it when I repeat myself again and again.... :lol:
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby cordy on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:11 pm

Just like when people say ATM Machine :lol:

Chris
cordy
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D

Re: Focusing on a 20D

Postby xorl on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:13 pm

cordy wrote:A little dissapointed with the D200 launch - price is pretty horrible and they havent really improved the focusing over the D70 much.

The reports I've seen from people who have handled a pre-production D200 indicate the focusing performance is a significant improvement over the D70 (as you would expect). Of course, until the final product is available for purchasing/reviewing we won't really know how well it performs.
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby Glen on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:14 pm

Cordy, how much faster than a D70 was the D200 focussing? (or probably more correctly, how much slower than the D2X was the focussing?)
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby cordy on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:37 pm

Glen

The D70 was CAMS800/900 from memory and the D200 is CAMS1000. Not a huge leap in my eyes, but there is more sensors which may help it a little. D2X is CAMS2000

Chris
cordy
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D

Re: Focusing on a 20D

Postby cordy on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:40 pm

xorl wrote:
cordy wrote:A little dissapointed with the D200 launch - price is pretty horrible and they havent really improved the focusing over the D70 much.

The reports I've seen from people who have handled a pre-production D200 indicate the focusing performance is a significant improvement over the D70 (as you would expect). Of course, until the final product is available for purchasing/reviewing we won't really know how well it performs.


If anything I would expect it to be more accurate, not necassarily faster..
cordy
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: Canberra - Nikon D70 / Canon 20D

Postby Glen on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:43 pm

Sorry Chris, I knew the specs, but there are already D200 in Australia and my fault I misunderstood and thought you had used it. Sorry.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby NikonUser on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:45 pm

Why are people saying that MultiCAM 1000 is dissapointing when no one has really tested it properly in a production camera yet?

Sure it is only '100' above the CAM900 used in the D70 but according to Nikon it's a totally redesigned thing.

I'm not saying that the D200 won't have dissapointing autofocus results.... or that it will be fantastic. I personally have no idea until I try one for myself....

It just seems that many people are making judgements about a camera they haven't seen apart from in some pre-production pictures.

Just my two cents.

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby xorl on Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:46 pm

There is a lot more to AF than the number used in the model version (number of sensors, sensor types, accuracy, speed, motor, tracking ability, low light sensitivity, ..). So far we know the number, type & layout of the sensors, everything else is unknown. It will be possible to judge the performance after the product has been released ;).
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:11 pm

I had used Canon 10d, Nikon D70, Nikon D2H and now Canon 20d. AF wise, I can say that 20d has better predictive AF than even the D2H in focus tracking. In terms of camera responsiveness, D2H is better. The other factor is the lens. Canon L lens are better in terms of AF performance.

I would be very disappointed if Nikon D200's AF is not better than D2H.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Stuart Trevena on Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:23 am

Hi All,

I have looked at the Nikon D70s for Aviation Photography, as I already have many suitable lenses, from my film days with a Nikon F601 and F60.

But after talking to the many members of jetspotter.com, (of which I am a member) most of which have either a Canon 20D or 300D (I think), I have decided to buy a Canon 20D with a 17-85mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM Lense and a EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Lense.

They tell me that the Canon 20D is far Superior in the Focus Dept., thanks in part to the CMOS Sensor.

I also asked several Camera stores in Geelong, which camera would be better, in the long run, they all said the same thing.

I think in some cases, Nikon is playing Catch Up.

Stuart
Stuart Trevena
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:22 am
Location: Lara, Geelong, Victoria

Postby Onyx on Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:20 am

Stuart Trevena wrote:They tell me that the Canon 20D is far Superior in the Focus Dept., thanks in part to the CMOS Sensor.


Quoted for ridicule.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby MattC on Sat Nov 26, 2005 4:04 am

Stuart Trevena wrote:But after talking to the many members of jetspotter.com.....
They tell me that the Canon 20D is far Superior in the Focus Dept., thanks in part to the CMOS Sensor.


I would be asking the experts at jetspotter.com for clarification on this.... considering that the CMOS sensor has absolutely nothing to do with focus speed....

Stuart Trevena wrote:I think in some cases, Nikon is playing Catch Up.


With what :?: :?: :?:

Cheers
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby dooda on Sat Nov 26, 2005 4:56 am

I don't understand people complaining about the price point of D200.
Half the price of the comparable 5D isn't reasonable? I don't get it.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby birddog114 on Sat Nov 26, 2005 5:54 am

Stuart Trevena,
This is not Nikon vs Canon or vice versa, each camera has its own capabilities and performance and depends to many factors as lenses, lighting, subject and the guy behing the viewfinder.

Pros & cons there are in both sides, with the D70 or 20D or D2 with 1Ds MKII.
The only thing make you happy that you choose what you want to do and buy what you can afford.

The guy with the 300 or 350D still taking better shots than the one with the 1Ds MKII same as the guy with the D50 to the one, who has the D2x.

At the end of the day, you're the one who has the final judgment on your purchases.

The stores, or salesmen only can tell or convince you what they want to sell, most of them do not have the knowledges or owning two or three cameras or lenses in difference brands, which they can prove or telling you the right track.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby gstark on Sat Nov 26, 2005 8:42 am

Stuart Trevena wrote:They tell me that the Canon 20D is far Superior in the Focus Dept., thanks in part to the CMOS Sensor.


Hi Stuart, and welcome.

But you need to seriously consider the implications of this statement of yours.

Consider that the only time that the COMS sensor is exposed to light is during that actuial time that the exposure is made. By that time, all of the focussing, and most of the, if not all of, the exposure readings have also been completed.

Otherwise, you'd still be focussing while actually in the process of making the exposure.

While that might be acceptable if you're looking for a secial effect, as a genral rule, that's not the way it works, and those who have told you this are, quite simply, full of shit.

As to photographing fast moving objects, I've used my D70 with the 80-400 - reputed to be a slow lens in the AF department - to shoot such slow moving objects as F1 racecars in full flight and the RAAF Hornets when they do their flypast at the F1 in Melbourne, with no issues relating to AF, following focus, or exposure.

Or anything else, for that matter. :)

As with these matters, it's really the person driving the camera that's the issue, and those who say that the D70 is better or worse than a D20 simply don't really know how to use their tools.

Either camera will turn out very high quality images, and neither camera will, once you understand how to use it, present issues in these areas.

My suggestion is to not listen to these idiots (the sensor controls AF ???? ROTFLMAO!) but to go into a local store and actually have a play with the cameras that you're considering buying. See which ones you feel more comfy with; which ones work better in your hands, and at your eye.

That's how you make a good decision, rather than listening to the sort of bullshit that you're quotiing here. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Aussie Dave on Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:27 am

gstark wrote:
Stuart Trevena wrote:They tell me that the Canon 20D is far Superior in the Focus Dept., thanks in part to the CMOS Sensor.


Hi Stuart, and welcome.

But you need to seriously consider the implications of this statement of yours.

Consider that the only time that the COMS sensor is exposed to light is during that actuial time that the exposure is made. By that time, all of the focussing, and most of the, if not all of, the exposure readings have also been completed.

Otherwise, you'd still be focussing while actually in the process of making the exposure.

While that might be acceptable if you're looking for a secial effect, as a genral rule, that's not the way it works, and those who have told you this are, quite simply, full of shit.

As to photographing fast moving objects, I've used my D70 with the 80-400 - reputed to be a slow lens in the AF department - to shoot such slow moving objects as F1 racecars in full flight and the RAAF Hornets when they do their flypast at the F1 in Melbourne, with no issues relating to AF, following focus, or exposure.

Or anything else, for that matter. :)

As with these matters, it's really the person driving the camera that's the issue, and those who say that the D70 is better or worse than a D20 simply don't really know how to use their tools.

Either camera will turn out very high quality images, and neither camera will, once you understand how to use it, present issues in these areas.

My suggestion is to not listen to these idiots (the sensor controls AF ???? ROTFLMAO!) but to go into a local store and actually have a play with the cameras that you're considering buying. See which ones you feel more comfy with; which ones work better in your hands, and at your eye.

That's how you make a good decision, rather than listening to the sort of bullshit that you're quotiing here. :)


Good advice Gary.

I can see how those new to dSLR photography can be easily fooled into thinking more MP is better, this camera has faster AF, etc. etc....but retailers tend to only tell customers what they want in order to sell the cameras they want to sell. I've overheard some pretty ridiculous things when visiting retail shops , and customers that don't know better lap it up.

Just the other day at work, I tried to explain to someone that MP between a dSLR and a P&S was not really comparible (and certainly not relevant to final picture quality - between the two)....but they thought I was full of shit because the salesman at the retail store (who apparently knew what he was talking about), said something completely different.

What to do ???

Stuart, do some research of your own on the net etc.., take it all in and then make your own mind up. That's what I did before I purchased my D70. As suggested, go to the shop and play with the cameras. The "technically" best camera may feel awkward and unattractive to you. Would you still buy it, not being happy with the feel of the camera, just because "on paper", or by one-eyed supporters of that particular brand. state it to be "the best" ?!?

Every camera has it's own pros & cons. Every camera has the potential to be "the best" (depending on what YOU want). There is no one camera that is best for everybody. If there was, we'd all have the same camera and there'd be no debate :roll:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Re: Hi

Postby sirhc55 on Sat Nov 26, 2005 4:54 pm

yeocsa wrote:I would be very disappointed if Nikon D200's AF is not better than D2H.

regards,

Arthur


Arthur - the D2H uses the CAM2000, the same as the D2X so there is no way that the D200 CAM100 will be better IMO :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby gstark on Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:50 pm

Aussie Dave wrote: retailers tend to only tell customers what they want in order to sell the cameras they want to sell. I've overheard some pretty ridiculous things when visiting retail shops , and customers that don't know better lap it up.

Just the other day at work, I tried to explain to someone that MP between a dSLR and a P&S was not really comparible (and certainly not relevant to final picture quality - between the two)....but they thought I was full of shit because the salesman at the retail store (who apparently knew what he was talking about), said something completely different.


At which point one should ask when the last time was that the salesperson had taken each camera out and shot of a 1GB card ull of images, PP'd them, and ran off some A3+ prints for framing.

Watch the salesdweebs run and hide like Michelle Leslie when the Bali Police and Muslim Association come a-knocking. :)

If the salesman genuinely knows how to use the features of the camera, then great. But I certainly wouldn't be holding my breath waiting for that to happen anytime soon ...
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Canon Corral

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests