50mm f1.8 MKII vs 50mm F1.4 USM

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

50mm f1.8 MKII vs 50mm F1.4 USM

Postby SileNceR_RH on Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:37 pm

Does anyone actually have each of these lenses?

I've been reading up a little and it sounds like both are quite nice except the bokeh is a bit of a letdown (along with strength/build quality of the casing) for the 1.8

There is of course the ~$300 price difference also.

I'm thinking I might get a 50mm 1.8 in the intermediary then save and grab a 1.4 down the track (or when I break the 1.8, as everyone who has thte 1.4 seems to have done?)

If someone has both, are you able to post up a couple of photos that are a direct comparison?
SileNceR_RH
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 am
Location: Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia

Postby Kris on Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:39 pm

Bit of a diff, BHPHoto video has a good price with the USD, no fees for you as its under $1k

1.8 is flimsy, total plastic, slow focusing, borderline bokeh and noisy.

1.4 has USM motor, faster focusing, better contrast, better construction, faster lens

In terms of light gathering abilities for both, there isn't too much! If your budget allows and you want a lens that can survive a bit of rough handling on the odd occasion and better oof areas, go the 1.4

1.2 is at a good price too these days! If you like back focusing :P
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:59 pm

With the strong conversion now, you can get the 1.4 from b&h for about 355 delivered.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby adam on Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:13 pm

Or you could get the f/1.4 second hand from some USA forums, even cheaper :)

I've got the f/1.8 II version and it's still working fine 3 years on.

Been looking for excuses to *upgrade* but this small, light and low-costed lens still makes me happy! Also the thought of buying another 50mm lens when I've already got this f/1.8 version.... Keeping my money for the 35L instead (which I see you have got Kris! :D :D)

Does the f/1.2L have backfocusing issues?
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby Kris on Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:15 pm

35L is a ripper

Yep 50 1.2 has back focus issues when close up... not so much a issue I hear if you're farish from the subject. Well documented issue on DPreview/FM
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby devilla101 on Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:22 pm

I have the 1.4 and have used the 1.8 mkI

Both lenses are really good.

Difference is the build quality and focusing speed.

Also its hard to focus on the 1.4 cause of very small plane your focusing on. Move a bit and your shot will be OFF
User avatar
devilla101
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia

Postby SileNceR_RH on Thu Nov 01, 2007 4:47 pm

Comparing to the 400D kit 18-55 3.5-5.6 lens, bokeh wise, is the 50mm 1.8 similar or better?

I know my other kit lens the 75-300 seems to have much nicer bokeh, how does that compare to the 1.8, or is that similar to the 1.4?
SileNceR_RH
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 am
Location: Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia

Postby !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! on Thu Nov 01, 2007 7:01 pm

SileNceR_RH wrote:Comparing to the 400D kit 18-55 3.5-5.6 lens, bokeh wise, is the 50mm 1.8 similar or better?

I know my other kit lens the 75-300 seems to have much nicer bokeh, how does that compare to the 1.8, or is that similar to the 1.4?

the 50mm 1.8 is quite different to the kit lenses, for the fact it goes to 1.8 vs the kits best at 3.5 is a good place to start the comparison. if anywhere near evening u need the flash with the kit lens whereas the 50mm is fine in lowish light.
Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D
50mm 1.8 EF
User avatar
!~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~!
Member
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Essendon - MELBOURNE

Postby SileNceR_RH on Thu Nov 01, 2007 7:12 pm

Yeah i've seen examples of the light let in, but how does the appearance of the bokeh compare?

My 18-55 has hexagonal (or similar) shapes in the out of focus areas, where the 75-300 tends to be much smoother and more polished - how do the 1.8 and 1.4 50mm prime lenses compare? I know the 1.4 is smoother, i've seen example photos with both, but is the 1.8 closer in terms of bokeh to the 75-300 than the 18-55?

[edit: I just found this http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/50v50 ]
SileNceR_RH
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 am
Location: Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia

Postby robert on Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:12 pm

I've got the 1.8 (mk II) and very happy with it, no experience with the 1.4

Here is a bit of a comparison,
http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/50v50

also for bokeh comparison pics
http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/10/18/c ... 14-vs-f18/
http://photo.net/equipment/canon/ef50/

Robert
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Postby daniel81 on Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:17 am

50mm 1.8 II was my first lens upgrade from the 400d kit lenses. The difference between that and the EFS 18-55 is staggering in terms of sharpness, low light speed & bokeh. There really is no competition between the two. I bought the EF S 17-85 IS USM for a bit more versatility, but still go for the 50mm prime when i can - it is that much sharper and faster. I will one day go for a faster, wider prime with USM to go along with it though... 50mm has its limits, and focusing can be a tad slow at times.
daniel81
Newbie
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:50 pm
Location: Woodcroft, Sydney

Postby SileNceR_RH on Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:50 am

Thanks Robert that's the type of thing I was looking for.

Daniel - the 50mm 1.8 II is sharper than the IS 17-85?
SileNceR_RH
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 am
Location: Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia

Postby Kris on Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:31 pm

You're comparing two TOTALLY different lens mate.

A prime vs a zoom, primes are always sharper. Both lens are like chalk and cheese, if you're to compare the 50 1.4 to the 50 1.8, the 50 1.4 is sharper at 50 1.8 then the 50 1.8 at 1.8 :D
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby SileNceR_RH on Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:59 pm

Ah thanks.

Still trying to get my head around how all this works...
SileNceR_RH
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 am
Location: Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia

Postby Grev on Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:19 am

I've tried all 3 versions of the 50mm prime on a 5D, and with just a brief answer, I will say that the f1.4 version is worth that little extra money.

I shot wide open with the 5D and the 50mm f1.2, thought the focused point (the Canon logo of the nearby 1Ds MkII, which I'll get to later) was a bit soft, and now I know there's a back focus issue with the lens then I know why it was that soft.

I also used the 1Ds MkII with the 85mm f1.2, was pretty nice, that's all I can say. :wink:
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Postby SileNceR_RH on Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:15 pm

My 50mm F1.4 should be here in the next week or so

Aren't birthdays great?
SileNceR_RH
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 am
Location: Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia


Return to Canon Corral

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests