SOFTNESS... 24-70

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

SOFTNESS... 24-70

Postby Viz on Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:43 am

I want to get some feedback regarding what I should expect form the 24-70. I am happy overall, very much so with regards to colour, though I have read PLENTY (read: obsessively - ask girlfriend) of reviews implying that this lens can be quite soft. I don't know what I am measuring the sharpness against. I have tested the lens on a 40D crop and the corners are good enough for my eyes, though have no 5D or 1Ds.. to see the 'real corners' on. It sharpens up nicely in PP, but I want to draw on the experiences of others.

Here are some large centre crops with no sharpening and with a linear raw conversion. Can I please have some feedback or, at least, reinforcement that these are acceptable. Warning big files!

Cheers, Dan PS please ignore flickr hating on adobe 1998
and also please note, these shots are aimed at exposing lens flaws, I am sure it can take very acceptable shots.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/patomaki/2124950928/" title="Centre Crop 4 by Vizual Pollution, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2311/2124950928_e747c509fb_o.jpg" width="1214" height="1214" alt="Centre Crop 4" /></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/patomaki/2124942776/" title="F 2.8 70mm by Vizual Pollution, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2199/2124942776_d0b5605eda_o.jpg" width="1480" height="1480" alt="F 2.8 70mm" /></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/patomaki/2124168099/" title="F 8.0 70mm by Vizual Pollution, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2365/2124168099_275550c075_o.jpg" width="1404" height="1404" alt="F 8.0 70mm" /></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/patomaki/2124941682/" title="F 2.8 70mm by Vizual Pollution, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2369/2124941682_4aedbc7e1a_o.jpg" width="1077" height="1077" alt="F 2.8 70mm" /></a>
Dan The Batch Automator
User avatar
Viz
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Leichhardt, Sydney

Postby Kyle on Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:29 am

Possible to take some photos of a page in a book at around F8?
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Oz_Beachside on Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:22 am

Kyle wrote:Possible to take some photos of a page in a book at around F8?


What homer said, and perhaps shutter speed over 1/200th second (if focal length say 70mm)
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby petal666 on Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:55 pm

Images will always be soft at high iso.
Canon 1D III
User avatar
petal666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III

Postby Bindii on Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:04 pm

Wow... someone needs to mow their lawn.. lol...

and honestly its kinda hard to tell as the images are so large.. but they look sharp enough to me.. I second the request to try and photograph some typing though..

P.S... I have the same lens and find it way sharp enough for my needs... :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby Kyle on Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:24 pm

Bindii wrote:P.S... I have the same lens and find it way sharp enough for my needs... :)


Same! I've never questioned the sharpness of it either
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby adam on Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:26 pm

Not sharp enough to cut the grass?
Looks quite grainy, try with lower ISO
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby Viz on Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:32 pm

Thanks all.

I have had a hectic week so the 7 day DOA period is expired, even if I did want to return it. I have noticed that it is a bit soft at 24, and that it makes the sound of two milled bits of metal rubbing at that length kind of 'zzz'. But I think that these are all acceptable as part of the parcel.

I have shot pic of text when I did the grass, and it performs well at 70. I shot this at 1/6th iso 200 F8.0. As soon as you apply any contrast, it really snaps up, I don't really know what else I was expecting.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/patomaki/2129409141/" title="Centre Crop 5_F8 6th sec by Vizual Pollution, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2258/2129409141_7c0ab83442_o.jpg" width="593" height="593" alt="Centre Crop 5_F8 6th sec" /></a>

All consided, I love the lens, colours, contrast and blur are great, and seeing as it is my only canon lens for now, I am quite happy.

As for cutting my lawn, I might need to get some razor sharp primes onto it. My lawn is actually a thriving ecosystem, none of this Kikuyu monoculture, though the pictures misrepresent that.
:D
Dan The Batch Automator
User avatar
Viz
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Leichhardt, Sydney

Postby gstark on Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:02 pm

Viz wrote:I shot this at 1/6th iso 200 F8.0.


Handheld?

Mounted on a 'pod? If so, what sort, and how did you trigger the shutter? Remote? MLU?

I would perform a few tests at varying focal lengths - 24, 35, 50, 70 - and a variety of apertures - 2.8, 5.6, 6.3, 8, 9, 11, 16 - for each of those focal lengths.

Mount the camera on a solid tripod, and if you can, shoot tethered or using a remote. If you shoot tethered though, you can change most settings from the computer and thus avoid upsetting the setup, as well as more immediately assess the images.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22896
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Viz on Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:54 pm

that was tripod mlu timed, please note that with default curves applied in acr, it is much better. Please, I am pleading with you to reinforce my purchase here... please :)

I have been assessing some walkabout shots, and it seems that 24mm is soft when focusing very close, I was impressed by a quick portrait i took @ around just under 1m f8, picked up all the soft facial hairs. But again I was a bit disappointed by results for focsing near infinity at 24mm. Though, with some sharpening, it brings it all home, but the word razor does not spring to mind.
Dan The Batch Automator
User avatar
Viz
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Leichhardt, Sydney


Return to Canon Corral

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests