Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby DebT on Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:07 pm

Ok I currently have the Canon 70-300 4-5.6 IS USM love it but keep getting told the L series is superior for clarity and the F2.8 a better way to go ... so have been looking at the 70-200 F2.8 and a 1.4 teleconvertor ...

Anyone tried both ? Hoping to use the groups wealth of hands on experience to spend my $$'s to the best advantage .

Rgds Deb T
DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
User avatar
DebT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby phoenix on Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:45 pm

Well i have the nikkor 70-200 lens, but i can tell you it's fantastic. I have the 2x TC and that works perfectly for almost all situations. If it's a low light situation, i just take off the TC and try and get closer. It's fantastic to be able to shoot at 2.8
phoenix
Member
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:32 pm
Location: Queanbeyan, NSW

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby TonyT on Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:25 am

I Have the 70-200 L IS 2.8 and 2+TC Its so clear and sharp I just love it with the 2*tc it a 5.6
A great lense
Tony
User avatar
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby mickeyjuice on Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:49 am

I've got mates who have both, so I've used them. I then bought the Sigma 70-200/2.8 :-)
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby fozzie on Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:04 am

Deb T - I think you would kick yourself if you did not get the Canon 70~200mm f/2.8L IS version.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/revie ... 00is.shtml

At the very end of this review, quote "The decision between the non-IS and the IS version of this lens is a no-brainer. The extra $750 gets you a lens with far greater versatility. It will get you shots that you otherwise will miss. If that's not worth the extra money, I don't know what is.

If you already own the original 70~200mm f/2.8L then the decision to upgrade is a bit tougher. You already know how good this lens is. If you can find someone to give you a good price for your old lens, and feel that adding IS will make sense for your style of shooting, then I believe it's worthwhile.

As for me, once the lens been returned to Canon Canada, (who were kind enough to lend it to me for this location test), I needed to figure how to fit one within my budget. It didn't take me long. A month later I had bought my own.

Conclusion: Recommended without reservation." unquote.

fozzie
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby jdear on Tue Mar 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Look at buying lenses as a long term investment. You will go through bodies, but lenses should be around for a while.
Build a collection that you won't be wanting to upgrade down the track.

Get the IS. I did.
User avatar
jdear
Senior Member
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Shellharbour, NSW

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby makario on Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:01 pm

get the IS version, i was tossing up between th IS and non IS between f2.8 and f4.0, but decided on the F2.8 IS. Got it a month ago. On the outset its a bit heavy but I love the IS.

Cheers
Mak
Canonian
"The Reward is in the doing of it..!!" - Worlds Fastest Indian (2005)
http://www.redbubble.com/people/makro
User avatar
makario
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Keilor, Melbourne, VIC

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby ozimax on Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:00 pm

Within the last 12 months I have owned, in this order, the Canon 70-200 F4 non IS, F2.8 IS then F2.8 non IS.

I rarely used the IS as I mainly photograph kids (portraits), birds and sports which are all moving subjects. I sold it and purchased the non IS version and am as happy as Larry. It is a tad lighter (though not much lighter) than the IS version. It is also, in my experience, much sharper. I have read numerous (50+) reviews re the sharpness of the two 2.8 lens and almost all agree that the non IS version is quite a bit sharper.

However, this is all subjective comment. You may get one particular copy of the IS version which is sharper than a non IS version. Sharpness is not everything in lens decisions. Bokeh, colour, versatility all need to be considered.

Lastly, you will need to consider the weight of the F2.8 lens. If you are using a 40D/5D/400D body, you will most probably need a battery grip to even out the weight of the setup. This makes for a heavy combination. I for one prefer a heavier camera/lens setup, but I am a reasonably beefy bloke.

Either way, with the F4 or F2.8 family of lens, they are amazing pieces of construction, beautifully designed, extremely versatile, and pro quality. I wish you well in your decision making.

Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5284
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby Grev on Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:53 am

Get the IS, can't go wrong.
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby DebT on Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:28 am

Thanks Guys appreciate the advice
.. tried the IS out on my 40D body and yes it's a bit heavier but seems to suit the camera weight and balances nicely , I'll take the advice on buying for the long term and go with the IS

so now I will be stalking the postie till it arrives

Have fun - know I will
Deb
DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
User avatar
DebT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby devilla101 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:42 am

Yep can't go wrong with that lens. My favorite lens for portraiture and IS is a great useful feature when the occasion calls for it
User avatar
devilla101
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:31 pm

Ahh the eternal baffling question.

Great choice and look forward to seeing your photos!

You'll love the lens wide open at 2.8. It's just a dream!
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby ozbastion on Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:21 am

It really depends on what you shoot. If it's a lot of day-time (outdoors etc) then IS is probably not going to help you very much.
If you're shooting in darker conditions, you'll need to be able to maintain a shutter speed of faster than 1/focal length, i.e. 1/200 for 200mm.

If those are the conditions, you will probably need IS.

It's about $800-1000 more for IS... for that price you can get another nice lens like a 135mm f/2L.. the choice is yours.
ozbastion
Newbie
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Canon 70-200 IS or not IS

Postby mickeyjuice on Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:34 am

ozbastion wrote:If you're shooting in darker conditions, you'll need to be able to maintain a shutter speed of faster than 1/focal length, i.e. 1/200 for 200mm.

If those are the conditions, you will probably need IS.


As long as the subject isn't moving much, because IS isn't going to help there either.
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria


Return to Canon Corral

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

cron