24-70 vs 24-105 F4

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

24-70 vs 24-105 F4

Postby ian.bertram on Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:26 pm

Hi all,
I'm soon to buy an upgrade to my trusty 40D with a 6D. My 40D came with a kit lens which is not full frame, so I need to go for the camera and lens kit.

The 6D comes with 2 choices, the 24-105 or the 24-70, both F4.

I already have a 70-200 2.8 (non is) plus a 100mm macro 2.8 and a cheapy 1.8 50mm

The 24-105 could be useful as a general lens for an upcoming trip to Cambodia, but from past experience I don't want to spend around $1000 on a lens that's just ok.

I know the 24-70 F2.8 is a great lens but the buy on the new version is to high for me!

Does anyone have experience with either of these lenses and willing to share their experiences, good or bad.

Thanks
Ian
User avatar
ian.bertram
Member
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:35 pm
Location: Panania, South Western Sydney, NSW

24-70 vs 24-105 F4

Postby Wink on Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:41 pm

I chose the 24-105 as I thought it would be a better general purpose lens. I love it. Useful focal length range and great image quality.

I haven't used a 24-70, but I'm sure it's also a great lens.

I don't think you can go wrong with either.
Adam.
MY PHOTOS
Allows Image Editing
User avatar
Wink
Senior Member
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:23 pm
Location: Seymour, VIC

Re: 24-70 vs 24-105 F4

Postby zafra52 on Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:25 pm

Same here!
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: 24-70 vs 24-105 F4

Postby ozimax on Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:54 pm

I've bought and sold more Canon "L" lens over the past 6-7 years than I can remember. One lens stays in my bag however, and that's the 24-105. It is my wedding and landscape workhorse. Indestructible and thoroughly recommended. (I did have to get mine calibrated by Canon, under warranty, and it came back a much better lens).

Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Panasonic G9, Panasonic 12-60 F3.5, Olympus 45 F1.8, Olympus 40-150 F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4946
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: 24-70 vs 24-105 F4

Postby TonyT on Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:49 am

I also have the 24-105 as my walk around lens. Never tried the 24-70.
User avatar
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT

Re: 24-70 vs 24-105 F4

Postby gstark on Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:32 pm

Ian, while I don't own a 24-105, I have used two different examples of it while reviewing Canon bodies, and I can only echo what everyone else here has said: it's truly a great lens. Both examples that I've used helped to turn out some wonderful images.

Were I to be making the purchase you're making, that would most definitely be my choice.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22562
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Canon Corral

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron