Low light lens for Full frame

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Low light lens for Full frame

Postby DebT on Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:24 am

Hi, looking for a low light lens for 5D11 and after some feedback on what users recommend and use
Have looked into 35 1.4, 50 1.2, 85 1.2 - yes I'm a brand snob and prefer L series but vcan only afford 1 (have the 24-70 2.8 but looking for a great prime for low light and great bokeh to make poitraits pop
DebT
DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
User avatar
DebT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Low light lense for Full frame

Postby fozzie on Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:01 pm

Hi Deb,

My thoughts are EF 85/1.2L or EF 135/2L for new toy 5DMII, congratulations.

Please note: new firmware just released.
http://canon.com.au/en-AU/Support-Servi ... I-firmware
fozzie

When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Re: Low light lense for Full frame

Postby robert on Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:35 pm

I dont have a nice portrait prime yet...but i think the 85 1.2 is just about the holy grail for us.

As far as low light, since getting my 5d mkII i just bump the iso- I am amazed by how little the image degrades.

If you dont have a tele zoom yet, maybe think about the new 70-200 2.8II IS, $500 more than the 85 at $3k, but gives a bit of versatility.

As far as DOF and pop from background, I was surprised to see f4 on full frame can give shallower area of focus than f2.8 on a crop body.
If you take the equiv 1.6 factor into account- ie FF at 135mm f4 @3metres = 0.11m, vs 7D at 85mm f2.8 @3m = 0.13
or FF 50mm f4 @3m =0.43 vs 31.3mm f2.8 @3m = 1m. see http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

Robert
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Re: Low light lense for Full frame

Postby gstark on Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:13 pm

fozzie wrote:My thoughts are EF 85/1.2L or EF 135/2L for new toy 5DMII, congratulations.


Mine too.

For a crop sensor camera, the 85 is brilliant. For FF, 105 - 135 has always been regarded as the ideal portraiture length.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22915
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Low light lens for Full frame

Postby dviv on Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:20 pm

I use the 50 1.4 (couldn't afford the 1.2). I use it on a crop body (40D) but from all reports it's pretty good on FF too.

I realise it's not an "L" but it's still a great lens. Highly recommended.
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney

Re: Low light lens for Full frame

Postby devilla101 on Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:57 pm

For portraits go with 85mm 1.2. You won't be sorry
User avatar
devilla101
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia

Re: Low light lens for Full frame

Postby DebT on Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:13 am

Thanks guys always good to hear from those that have used ...off to purchase nice pre-loved 85
DebT
DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
User avatar
DebT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Low light lens for Full frame

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:42 am

85 is a great lens.

Just be aware that with all that glass, AF maybe a tad slower than with the non L lens.

Enjoy the search and eventual photo takin with the lens
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Low light lens for Full frame

Postby devilla101 on Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:19 am

PiroStitch wrote:85 is a great lens.

Just be aware that with all that glass, AF maybe a tad slower than with the non L lens.

Enjoy the search and eventual photo takin with the lens


Most definitely. The AF is piss slow. Personally I don't use it for 'action' shots and I rarely use 1.2.

Also allow extra time when PP images taken with the lens. Its freakin' sharp even wide open!
User avatar
devilla101
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia

Re: Low light lens for Full frame

Postby Big V on Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:57 pm

Deb look forward to seeing that bad boy in action, it will be interesting to compare the 1.2 to the 1.8
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide


Return to Canon Corral