2 birds from this morning

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

2 birds from this morning

Postby avkomp on Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:55 pm

juvenile black shouldered kite
Image
superb fairy wren
Image
Both d70, 80-400vr @ 400, metz 60ct1, handheld.
Last edited by avkomp on Sun Jan 08, 2006 3:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby thaddeus on Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:03 pm

Very nice - the wren looks quite on edge, doesn't it?
User avatar
thaddeus
Member
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby avkomp on Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:11 pm

I think these things are fairly highly strung at the best of times, was hopping from branch to branch as they do.

Besides, you would have been nervous also if you saw some big ugly mug like me, trying to look inconspicuous, pointing a longish lens. :D

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby kipper on Sat Sep 24, 2005 5:59 pm

Will take a look at these again Steve when I'm out of 640x480 mode (just reinstalling linux for the 1000000 time - distro hopping). So far they look pretty good though at this res :)

I like the Wren the most as the lighting seems to be the best. The juv Black Shouldered seems a bit in shadow and could of done with some fill flash (or more flash output if you were using a flash).
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby petermmc on Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:03 pm

I particularly like the wren because I know how difficult it is to capture one for a split second. Those things dart and dodge but are one of the prettiest little critters in the flying world.

Great shots and inspiring.

Peter Mc
Nikon & Olympus
User avatar
petermmc
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Figtree, Wollongong

Postby avkomp on Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:16 pm

have reposted the image with photoshop shadow hightlight tool run.
plus a little digital velvia for some saturation.

I normally use -1ev fill but may have used less (cant remember now and dont have one of those smart talk to camera flashes)

The main nit I had with this is the fact that I shoulda used more fill

And of course the fact that the kite perched exactly where the wren was but after I had moved and was on my way out. Doh!!
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby NikonUser on Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:18 pm

Awesome shots. I love thw wren!! I sure appreciate how hard they are to take.

What was the lens you used? You must have been pretty close (assuming these aren't 100% crops :) )

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby avkomp on Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:34 pm

Paul: The wren was taken with the nikkor 80-400vr @ 400mm handheld.
Range was about 3 metres.

Took around 2 hours to get a shot where all was well. was hiding in wet reedy stuff. luckily no leeches or other nasties

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Manta on Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:44 pm

Beautiful results for your efforts Steve. Well done.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby kipper on Sat Sep 24, 2005 7:41 pm

Avkomp well done and the persevernce pays off. As you're probably starting to notice you have to spend time in an area for the bird(s) to come accustomed to your presence (some will, some won't).
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Killakoala on Sat Sep 24, 2005 8:10 pm

They look absolutely beautiful. The wren is magnificent.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Cows Go Moo on Sun Sep 25, 2005 8:53 pm

I like the wren. Went hunting some birds this afternoon over near Newington. I could hear them and catch glimpses but couldn't quiet catch one....
User avatar
Cows Go Moo
Member
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:24 pm
Location: Ermington, NSW

Postby Manta on Sun Sep 25, 2005 8:56 pm

Welcome Cows Go Moo - what a cool forum name!
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Slider on Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:00 pm

Awesome shots. Love the 1st.
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby avkomp on Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:31 pm

Cows go moo: I found that the birds around there are skittish, same around the park here but are more relaxed around the boat ramp.

Wrens are hard to get though I have been trying the walk around technique and photographing targets of opportunity, but with them it never happens.

you need somewhere with good light and good perches and then when you see them, you have to wait and hope a shot presents itself. you also need to make sure that you get plenty of shots too because these things move often and suddenly resulting in blur.

I had to sit in long wet grass for ages to get the wren.

The kite was a fluke though, I thought it was going to be too far away and turned out amazingly sharp considering it was handheld and taken from a standing position. must remember to send mr nikon a thankyou for VR.

Not convinced the 80-400vr is the go for flight shots though. takes ages to focus (at least on the d70). You need also to make sure that you use the af limit switch on the lens. If you dont use it when shooting flight shots and you happen to move the af zone off the target, then the lens hunts thru both max and min focus ranges, this causes the image in the viewfinder to blur and you wont be able to track the target. With the limit engaged though, it will only hunt in the general range in which focus was lost and you wont lose the target in your viewfinder and you can quickly reacquire the subject and hopefully get the shot.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques