unsharp mask questionModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators 
		
			Forum rules 
	Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this. 
            Previous topic • Next topic 
			14 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
unsharp mask questionwhat do you guys typically use for your settings with USM? 
                  
            body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601. 
		lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com 
 There is no fixed settings because it all depends on the photo itself. Some pics will require none, some will required a little and some even more. Check your pics as you apply and go with the one that is sharp but has not introduced ”halos”. 
                  
            Chris 
		-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left 
 Re: unsharp mask question
 USM stands for UnSharpen Mask????????? 
 OK,
 
                  
            so anyone got any tips or explanation of how the tool works itself? I use it, but fairly touch and go... i'd like to know how it actually works I guess body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601. 
		lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com 
 Re: unsharp mask question
 yep thats what I've seen it refferred to commonly around the place? body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601. 
		lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com 
 Re: unsharp mask question
 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHH! Why would you want to unsharpen something???? 
 
 This one is a basic explanation that helped me.. http://www.iforphotos.com/guides/post-processing-basics?page=0,5 or wikpedia for more detail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_mask "The "unsharp" of the name derives from the fact that the technique uses a blurred, or "unsharp", positive to create a "mask" of the original image. The unsharped mask is then combined with the negative, creating the illusion that the resulting image is sharper than the original." 
 Re: unsharp mask question
 In Canon lens terms, it also can mean Ultra Sonic Motor, which is the type of (internal, to the lens) motor used to drive the lens focus mechanism. If your confsued, then great; join the clubbbbbb. g. 
		Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet 
 PRECISELY what I wanted! Cheers! 
 the 'wonderful' world of acronyms, huh. body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601. 
		lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com 
 There is a technique that is often used for nature photographs when publishing for the web: http://www.naturescapes.net/phpBB2/view ... p?t=105932
 
                  
            
		This doesn't always work, but often produces good results. You don't have to worry about the settings for USM and you just Sharpen as many times as needed to get the result you want. 
 Don't you just love terminology which seems completely arse-about?
 
                  
            Personally, I use slightly more amount than that suggested in the linked article (maybe 80% as a starting point) and slightly less than 1 pixel. But it is all about getting to know the effect settings have. I believe it is generally preferable to use the USM after resizing the image (if you are resizing) The benefits of applying USM to (copies of) the same image file 4 or 5 times and comparing the resulting images can be enormous.... say Amount 40% - 60% - 80% - 80% - 80% Pixels 0.8 - 0.8 - 0.8 - 1.0 - 1.2 (and so on as much as you like) You will soon get an idea of what does what Greg  - - - -  D200 etc 
		Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer 
 At the risk of stating the obvious - Smart Sharpen in the newer flavours of Photoshop is better to use than Unsharp Mask.  But see my disclaimer below  
                  
            Peter 
		Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com *** 
 I tend to use a couple of rounds of sharpening, depending upon the image.
 
                  
            
		To overcome the bluriness of the AA filter, I tend to use a fairly high Amount, with a very low Radius (0.3 to 0.4) - this is also good for very fine detail. For local contrast enhancement, another technqiue (named loamhirad) - Lo Amount, High Radius as mentioned by Photoshop expert Dan Margulis is quite popular. Finally, after all image adjustments, if I have done some resizing, I may do a small amount of sharpening to overcome the bluriness of the resizing. Sharpening in the L channel is recommended. Oh, and as Peter mentions, Smart Sharpen seems to produce slightly better results. 
 
            Previous topic • Next topic  
			14 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
 |