IS lenses vs non IS lenses, are they worth the extra money?
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Hey everyone, I was wondering what your thoughts were on IS vs non IS lenses, are they worth the extra money?
I'm thinking of getting a Canon EOS 1100D with the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens and the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Lens. I can get this for $709 AUD.
I can get the same but with the the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II Lens and the Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1.2 Lens Canon Mount (both lenses non-IS) for $547 AUD.
Should I save some money and go with the non IS or should I spend a bit more and get the IS kit?
Also, does anyone know the real world battery life for the Canon EOS 1100D? I never trust the specs on the websites so I'm looking for people who have this camera to tell me the approximate battery life.
Thanks for anyones help![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
I'm thinking of getting a Canon EOS 1100D with the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens and the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Lens. I can get this for $709 AUD.
I can get the same but with the the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II Lens and the Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1.2 Lens Canon Mount (both lenses non-IS) for $547 AUD.
Should I save some money and go with the non IS or should I spend a bit more and get the IS kit?
Also, does anyone know the real world battery life for the Canon EOS 1100D? I never trust the specs on the websites so I'm looking for people who have this camera to tell me the approximate battery life.
Thanks for anyones help
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)